[Meego-architecture] Maliit and MeeGo Core Compliance
Arjan van de Ven
arjan at linux.intel.com
Tue Jul 12 08:27:03 PDT 2011
On 7/12/2011 6:58 AM, Michael Hasselmann wrote:
> [M] http://maliit.org
> [ARCH] http://maliit.org/doc/framework/architecture.html
> * We would also want to require that the Maliit framework is the input
> method solution that's actually used, not just shipped.
that's what compliance means... just having the bits on spinning rust /
electrons in a well does not suffice; you can't put something "next" to
a core component and only use yours.
(this is for example why geoclue is not part of compliance; we
explicitly want to allow people to put something next to it, given the
current state of geoclue)
I assume this request is for the 1.3 timeframe ?
More information about the MeeGo-architecture