[Meego-architecture] Maliit and MeeGo Core Compliance

[Michael Hasselmann]

On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 06:57 -0600, Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
> it's the physical mechanism yes, but I don't think this is the right
> way to get it done.  there's nothing wrong with filing bugs in these
> locations but to be honest, those will come to me and then I'll
> struggle with "how does a decision get made", i.e. the same place we
> are now.

Since there hasn't been anyone rejecting my request to include Maliit in
the list of MeeGo core compliant packages, let's assume that everyone is
fine with it, shall we? And you could just put into the arch overview
diagram. Otherwise, we'll never come to a decision on this list.

thanks,
Michael