[meego-commits] 6376: Changes to Trunk:Testing/kcalcore
michael.meeks at novell.com
Mon Aug 9 19:18:05 UTC 2010
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 17:58 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 8/9/2010 8:55 AM, Zhu, Peter J wrote:
> > I'm not sure it should goes into Core. This and mkcal and all related
> > stuff might be handset specific and should go into Trunk:handset.
> it should absolutely go into Trunk.
> kcalextend is THE calendar solution for all MeeGo verticals;
> this is defined by the architecture.
Who made this decision ?
Who defined the architecture ? (and where ?)
Where was this communicated ?
My plan to support the QtMoblity calendaring / addressbook APIs was to
implement them on top of e-d-s for the Netbook vertical.
Presumably if they work on top of Symbian, e-d-s will be a relatively
There are substantial knock-on consequences from your contention; again
- what was the decision making process here ?
michael.meeks at novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
More information about the MeeGo-commits