[meego-commits] 5493 declined: home:yyin2:branches:Trunk:Testing/pm-utils to Trunk:Testing/pm-utils
Zhu, Peter J
peter.j.zhu at intel.com
Mon Jul 12 14:00:32 UTC 2010
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arjan van de Ven [mailto:arjan at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 9:57 PM
> To: Yin, Yan
> Cc: Zhu, Peter J; Li, Yan I; Zhang, Austin; Liu, Bing Wei;
> meego-commits at meego.com
> Subject: Re: 5493 declined: home:yyin2:branches:Trunk:Testing/pm-utils to
> On 7/12/2010 12:31 AM, Yin, Yan wrote:
> >> Can you elaborate on why we don't want to ship these policy code into
> >> I can imagine we don't need the policy at all for handset platform, but we
> >> package these policy into a separate netbook/slate specific package.
> >> Peter
> > [[Yan Yin]] The same question with Peter, upower daemon would call
> pm-powersave to reduce the power consumption when required, these policies
> will make sure the components enter/back from low power mode correctly. Are
> there any specific considerations here?
> > Is it because similar policies been implemented elsewhere? I searched the list
> but didn't find laptop-mode-scripts there...
> it is completely misguided to only do power save on battery.
> We ALWAYS want to do the things that are power save!
> Especially the ones pm-utils do....
> This is the problem with them, doing these only on battery is completely
> misguided and wrong.
So we should enhance the policy to take effect even in ac mode rather than NOT shipping them, if I understand correctly
More information about the MeeGo-commits