[MeeGo-dev] MeeGo-commits ... reply-to to MeeGo dev ?
felipe.contreras at gmail.com
Thu Aug 19 13:16:43 PDT 2010
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:28 PM, David Greaves <david at dgreaves.com> wrote:
> So, having argued for the reply-to on meego-dev and -community to *not* be
> munged I'd like to suggest that meego-commits *is* munged and reply-to is
> set to meego-dev or meego-packaging.
> The rationale is that few people will want to track the meego-commits stream
> directly (many of which are autogenerated) but almost every reply thread
> raises an issue which has relevance to a wider audience in the
> devel/packaging lists. See some in 
> It also seems to makes most sense to have those conversations archived in a
> meaningful list.
> I suggest meego-dev as a more generic list.
I disagree. Some replies belong to meego-commits, some to
meego-packaging, and some might belong to meego-dev. It should be
policy what determines what goes into which mailing lists.
More information about the MeeGo-dev