[MeeGo-dev] MeeGo core utiltities, coreutils or busybox?

[ezjd]

Here is the link
http://www.linuxfordevices.com/c/a/News/Intel-and-Nokia-MeeGo/ and quote "The
open source MeeGo builds on the capabilities of the Moblin core OS, but
combines "the momentum of Maemo in the mobile industry" as well as the Qt UI
toolkit from Maemo"

I did see similar thing in IRC and emails but hard to find the reference.

btw, personally I don't think it is good solution as Moblin image is so big
at GB level and I'd recommend starting from much smaller one like Maemo and
"enrich" it.

Regarding the HW requirement, that is my own idea from my experience.

Thanks.
JD

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Jeremiah Foster <
jeremiah.foster at pelagicore.com> wrote:

>
> On Feb 25, 2010, at 8:33 PM, ezjd wrote:
>
> > As MeeGo infrastructure is based on Moblin,
>
> I do not believe that is in fact the case, at least not officially. I also
> think MeeGo on ARM will look quite different from Moblin. What are you
> basing your conclusion on here?
>
> > However I don't expect the target device to be 32GiB flash or similar :-)
>  The minimal HW requirement like 64MiB flash,
>
> Where are you getting these "minimal requirements"? Is there a reference
> platform somewhere?
>
>
> The GPLv3 is a license that protects the user's freedoms. It has stronger
> legal protections for the four freedoms than say the MIT, modified BSD, etc.
> That can be "problematic" for certain companies but it should not
> necessarily be problematic for MeeGo.
>
>
> Jeremiah
> _______________________________________________
> MeeGo-dev mailing list
> MeeGo-dev at meego.com
> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.meego.com/pipermail/meego-dev/attachments/20100226/e0446d74/attachment.html>