[MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)
patrick.ohly at intel.com
Tue Mar 8 08:25:21 PST 2011
On Di, 2011-03-08 at 05:14 +0000, Sateesh Babu wrote:
> > SyncEvolution is an existing mature open source project with a history of
> > functionality and compatibility, and we're confident that
> > the switch to this project will benefit Sync in MeeGo for years to come.
> The complete MTP stack is part of Buteo contributed from Nokia. Are you also
> removing it too?
No, we would like to use it. But it is not complete yet (USB transport
driver still missing). My understanding is that Bernd Wachter is working
on changing that; I definitely look forward to trying that out.
There are also no plans to remove Buteo Sync Framework, at least not
immediately. What I can imagine for MeeGo 1.2 is that we (Intel) go back
to my original proposal from the Maemo/Moblin merger discussions: use
the stable, proven SyncEvolution/Synthesis combination for SyncML inside
the Buteo Sync Framework.
What Arjan announced is the architecture decision. I'm currently working
on a plan to execute on it. Right now I am (literally) talking to a lot
of people to identify dependencies and options. I'll post a write-up as
soon as possible (likely next week, once I am back from my US trip).
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
More information about the MeeGo-dev