[MeeGo-dev] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

[Mathias Hasselmann]

Am Dienstag, den 15.03.2011, 09:33 +0200 schrieb Adrien Bustany:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:10:18 +0100, Ville M. Vainio wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Patrick Ohly 
> > <patrick.ohly at intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I've said before and I say it again here, I consider performance
> >> comparisons pointless at this time.
> >
> > Considering that e-d-s has a much more modest feature set than 
> > tracker
> > (tracker in general being a much more ambitious project), I would 
> > have
> > expected it to to trounce tracker in performance, which doesn't seem
> > to be the case.
> >
> > This evidence might prompt to re-evaluate this part of the
> > architectural plans. Or at least leave the door open to transitioning
> > back to tracker when it's feasible.
> 
>  If you're interested in the saving performance of both solutions, I
>  answered the thread on the Tracker ML (didn't want to cross-spam
>  Meego-Dev). If you abstract the fact that EDS has no batching API (and
>  therefore seems to issue a fsync after saving each contact) by running
>  it over libeatmydata, EDS is approximately twice faster than
>  qtcontacts-tracker (though that area is being optimized currently). I
>  haven't done any contact fetching benchmarks.

Could you post an archive link here for convenience?

Thank you,
Mathias

-- 
Mathias Hasselmann <mathias at openismus.com>
http://openismus.com/