[MeeGo-dev] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)
mathias at openismus.com
Tue Mar 15 02:21:12 PDT 2011
Am Dienstag, den 15.03.2011, 09:33 +0200 schrieb Adrien Bustany:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:10:18 +0100, Ville M. Vainio wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Patrick Ohly
> > <patrick.ohly at intel.com> wrote:
> >> I've said before and I say it again here, I consider performance
> >> comparisons pointless at this time.
> > Considering that e-d-s has a much more modest feature set than
> > tracker
> > (tracker in general being a much more ambitious project), I would
> > have
> > expected it to to trounce tracker in performance, which doesn't seem
> > to be the case.
> > This evidence might prompt to re-evaluate this part of the
> > architectural plans. Or at least leave the door open to transitioning
> > back to tracker when it's feasible.
> If you're interested in the saving performance of both solutions, I
> answered the thread on the Tracker ML (didn't want to cross-spam
> Meego-Dev). If you abstract the fact that EDS has no batching API (and
> therefore seems to issue a fsync after saving each contact) by running
> it over libeatmydata, EDS is approximately twice faster than
> qtcontacts-tracker (though that area is being optimized currently). I
> haven't done any contact fetching benchmarks.
Could you post an archive link here for convenience?
Mathias Hasselmann <mathias at openismus.com>
More information about the MeeGo-dev