[MeeGo-dev] [MeeGo-community] MeeGo as a vehicle for Qt-based products?

[Luis Araujo]

On 10/01/2011 11:19 AM, Gabriel Beddingfield wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Michael Hasselmann
> <michaelh at openismus.com>  wrote:
>> On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 10:13 -0500, Gabriel Beddingfield wrote:
>>> With Intel removing the lion's share of those developer resources...
>>> it would be foolish to continue that failed approach.  It sets
>>> everyone up for failure.
>> I feel as if you over-estimate Intel's software development efforts for
>> MeeGo.
> Well... MeeGo loses Auke... and that's pretty darn big IMHO.  :-)
>
> I'm not going to bicker over head count or even quality.  You wanna
> support 5 verticals, go ahead.  Make us all proud.  I think it's a
> plan for failure.
Why so much fuss about the different verticals?

This is up to the interest of the different volunteers, if someone wants 
to work in a specific area, let it be; as long as there exist certain 
coordination and a modular way of communication between the groups (as I 
earlier proposed), everything should be fine, there is no need to set in 
stone the exclusion of any of the verticals, or exclusively narrow down 
MeeGo to a single one.


    --- Luis