[MeeGo-dev] [MeeGo-community] MeeGo as a vehicle for Qt-based products?
luis.araujo at collabora.co.uk
Sat Oct 1 16:03:43 UTC 2011
On 10/01/2011 11:19 AM, Gabriel Beddingfield wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Michael Hasselmann
> <michaelh at openismus.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 10:13 -0500, Gabriel Beddingfield wrote:
>>> With Intel removing the lion's share of those developer resources...
>>> it would be foolish to continue that failed approach. It sets
>>> everyone up for failure.
>> I feel as if you over-estimate Intel's software development efforts for
> Well... MeeGo loses Auke... and that's pretty darn big IMHO. :-)
> I'm not going to bicker over head count or even quality. You wanna
> support 5 verticals, go ahead. Make us all proud. I think it's a
> plan for failure.
Why so much fuss about the different verticals?
This is up to the interest of the different volunteers, if someone wants
to work in a specific area, let it be; as long as there exist certain
coordination and a modular way of communication between the groups (as I
earlier proposed), everything should be fine, there is no need to set in
stone the exclusion of any of the verticals, or exclusively narrow down
MeeGo to a single one.
More information about the MeeGo-dev