[Meego-kernel] [PATCH] Nokia use-case to be able to route modem trace data to defined port.
Thu Sep 23 07:18:58 PDT 2010
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:22:08PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 06:57:10 -0700
> Greg KH <gregkh at suse.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:57:19AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > No Signed-off-by:?
> > > >
> > > > Why hasn't this been sent upstream for review?
> > >
> > > How about because this stuff is nowhere near ready for an upstream.
> > > It needs to get finished and tidied up so we can answer a few
> > > questions like
> > >
> > > "What should a kernel PTI trace layer actually look like"
> > Agreed.
> > But is that what this list is for? Random submissions that wish to be
> > included in meego but have a long way to go before getting upstream?
> We've been asked to make the internal meego driver work use a published
> list. So yes effectively patches could be anything from enablers for
> internal project work that will never go upstream to stuff that is
> ready to go there.
Ok. So, what is the rule to get patches into the MeeGo kernel? That
they just be sent here?
Sorry, I'm still a bit confused as to what this list is for.
More information about the Meego-kernel