[meego-packaging] autospectacle

[fathi.boudra at nokia.com]

> Maybe I can explain a little for YAML choice. The origin spectacle
> design was from Anas, but
> I can understand the YAML selection very well and be very glad to
> develop along with it.
> In spectacle's implementation, we also use a spec template (in Cheetah
> syntax) to generate target
> spec files, and the metadata need to be stored in a clean and readable
> format: ini?, json?, xml?, or YAML?
> I feel the YAML is best choice too.

Thanks for the explanation.

> Anyway, I think the spectacle solution has no big conflict with your
> spec template idea, right?

No, it isn't a big conflict :)
Our goal is the same: we want efficient helper tools for the packaging.
That's just different opinion on the implementation.