[meego-packaging] Proposal for change in PulseAudio packaging of configuration
carsten at maemo.org
Thu Dec 2 11:34:33 PST 2010
2010/12/2 Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok at intel.com>:
> On 12/02/10 08:56, Andrew Flegg wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 16:42, Arjan van de Ven<arjan at linux.intel.com>
>>> On 12/2/2010 8:26 AM, Andrew Flegg wrote:
>>>> I'd suggest coming up with a name (or a comment at the top of the
>>>> file) which suggests this is something very different to the machine's
>>>> *name* (i.e. /etc/hostname). "People" might try customising it.
>>>> /etc/machinetype, perhaps, or /etc/archtype?
>> Yeah, I like that. (FWIW)
> I like this, especially since on x86 we rely mostly on sysfs dmi boardname
> values. We can come up with something for ARM that gives us the same
> resolution (from w/e proc/cpuinfo or other info available).
> Carsten, I'll setup a gitorious project named "boardname" where we can start
> coding, do you want to own the ARM specific parts of this?
Yes, count me in - I'll probably have to provide the first N900 code
for it anyway..
I wonder how specific we have to be with board names.. I mean, I have
a Vendor: LENOVO , Board name: Caucasus2 here.
Should we do LENOVO Caucasus2 in a board file or?
More information about the MeeGo-packaging