[meego-packaging] MeeGo and compatibility with other distros
Anas Nashif
nashif at linux.intel.com
Thu Jul 1 10:33:36 PDT 2010
On 2010-07-01, at 1:26 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I have .spec file that works fine for Fedora, RHEL, OpenSUSE, and
> MeeGo... isn't that a good thing?
>
> Ok, I don't know about OpenSUSE, but I'm familiar with Fedora
> guidelines, and from what I can see they are not that different from
> MeeGo's.
>
> I only see a few differences:
>
> 1) Release: 1%{?dist}
While obs does not complain about this, it is not good, since you cant manipulate the Release if you need to. Release is usually managed by obs itself.
%{?dist} in the Release makes the release number equal nil and you cant set it correctly to override automatic release numbering done by obs.
%{?dist} is not need because we do this differently and unlike fedora we do not have an extension like this, we used to have to for moblin, but not anymore.
Anas
> 2) %changelog
>
> OBS seems to be happy having these... So I guess it should be ok for
> MeeGo, right?
>
> --
> Felipe Contreras
> _______________________________________________
> MeeGo-packaging mailing list
> MeeGo-packaging at meego.com
> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
More information about the MeeGo-packaging
mailing list