[meego-packaging] Removing OpenCV
kad at kad.name
Sun Nov 28 12:13:43 PST 2010
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Arjan van de Ven <arjan at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 11/28/2010 8:14 AM, Alexander Kanevskiy wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Arjan van de Ven<arjan at linux.intel.com>
>>> On 11/28/2010 6:59 AM, Zhu, Peter J wrote:
>>>> It’s not used by any verticals or included in any pkg groups.
>>>> Please let us know if there are objections...
>>> which bug is there in the package that warrants removing it?
>>> (I understand that fixing unused packages might be too much work for
>>> but if there's no bugs ........
>> A bit different question: where is MeeGo Architecture Forum decision
>> about removing some packages ?
> there is no decision to delete packages like this, and I'm pretty sure there
> won't be one;
> I for sure will be against it... esp for packages that have no serious
> maintenance burden.
Well, it's not question of who for or against removal.
My point was that all packages that we have in MeeGo should have clear
owner/maintainer and clear understanding and description where this
package fits to architecture of MeeGo. So any addition or removal of
packages should go trough process of FEA# and reviewal of Business
people and Architects Forum to give a decision either this package
present or not present in MeeGo. It shouldn't be anarchy of adding or
br, Alexander Kanevskiy
More information about the MeeGo-packaging